Since I don't ever use this blog, I figured I'd post what's being censored at the Delco-Famous Spencerblog.
Today, Gil stated that all posts will be subject to comment monitoring before being added to the blog or left off. In his words, "From now on, all comments will now be monitored for civility and being on topic. " SO... staying on Top, I decided to post one as "PC POLICE" twice to see what happens:
PC POLICE said...
WE HAVE TAKEN OVER THIS BLOG.
WE HAVE TAKEN OVER THIS BLOG.
YOU WILL BE ASSIMILATED.
RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.
Wouldn't you know it was censored? On topic, open expression, fair criticism of the new procedure. Gil must have enjoyed the Olympics in Beijing a little too much, he's taking on their government's mannerisms!
If anyone makes their way over to this "massively busy and on-topic" blog, feel free to comment away, we're not hiding!
To See the slow, painful death of a Blog, feel free to visit http://www3.allaroundphilly.com/blogs/delcotimes/gils/blog.html. Tell spencerblog I sent you, if you post gets through!
13 comments:
Steve-
This is pretty funny, because I made a similar comment (not yet posted through Spencer Filter) about my blog:
http://padelcowatch.blogspot.com/
Funny how we all agree Spencer is being a tool about this.
Some of us go too far on the blog with certain comments, sure. But it's much easier to resolve through deleting posts that go too far rather than by sorting things out by the use of a monitoring period. You're dead on about the wait-period, repetition in posting and etc.
We might as well revert to "Letters to the Editor" - maybe they'll be published faster.
Gil is a Commie! LMAO!
Yeah, as much as I hate filthy lying Liberals, I hate censorship more. Nearly every blog or message board I've ever been on this has happened to sooner or later (It's not me, really! Lol…) It is an easy bet that if we were to migrate to, say, DDD’s board that he would censor Rightie folks like me. It’s always the Libs. This is why I suspect Gil was under Lib orders from above to clean up his blog’s act.
The best boards are the ones that have ZERO censorship because when people are truly free to speak their minds only then can things get resolved. I’ve actually came to agreement with a few Libs through the years, after fighting it out as sworn enemies. (Don’t get your hopes up, DDD.)
Nothing should be off limits or PCed out (except spam and child porn and crap like that).
This is why I’m not even really bothered by anonymous posters, if that cloak is what it takes to bring some meeker folks out. Until they get to spouting really offensive Libism. Then, of course, I am forced to call them on their cowardice. Lol…
Nice place ya got here, S. Any chance of letting posters start their own threads? And how about ditching that annoying word verification thing? Yeah, I move right in and try to change a place! Lol…
raqndal, I'm open to opening other threads by posters, let me play with it through the weekend. And despite you and dave's relationship, give him the benefit of the doubt - he opened his blog as well!
raqndal
Waddaya think I'm black?! Man, I thought we were buds... Lol...
Yeah, I'm not likely to go to Dave's place. It's all dripping with filthy Libism in the extreme. And it had a funny smell. I wouldn't want to go validating that mess by increasing his traffic and click count. He should blog alone, like Gil will be doing, rather than infecting others with his Libism disease.
RR-
Thanks for not coming over to my blog and wasting bandwidth.
Steve-
Randal doesn't want to post on my blog as it would give him a more traceable identity that the Secret Service could use to track him down the next time he post a comment threatening Obama's life. Spencer took down Randal's previous threats before I had the opportunity to contact the authorities. If Randal thinks the no-fly lists and big brother security are so great, just wait until he gets on the Secret Service list. :-)
randal,
i had to remove the post. we can't start posting personal information like addreses and etc. it becomes an invasion of privacy - i know i wouldn't want to see my own address posted on a blog!
Dave, I only saw his post around 11:15pm tonight, otherwise I would have taken it down sooner. sorry!
Fair enough, S, I figured you would remove it. It was up long enough anyway. But then how about you also remove Lying Dave’s post here designed to get me in trouble.
Unlike him, I am a man of integrity. Had I said what he so dishonestly has accused me of I would stand by it, regardless of consequence. But I didn’t, and he well knows this. So do you.
But maybe we should let our friends at the Secret Service decide whether or not David Diano's threats on President Bush’s life were serious or not.
the whole "secret service" nonsense is strictly between the two of you. I'm not getting involved unless you post private information.
So what you’re saying is that lies designed to get someone in trouble are ok and welcome here while facts intended to do the very same thing are not.
Maybe you’ve been hanging around with Libs too long, S.
I’m all about full disclosure. I’d post my personal info if everyone would. But mouthy cowards like Dave would never go for it. They live in fear and only find their arrogance from safely behind a computer. I’ll bet he’s meek in person. But then, we also know that his is an unarmed home.
I must have missed you over labor day on the last one, r.
I noted that the secret service stuff is RIDICULOUS and NONSENSICAL and if dave is trying to call them about blog posts he's being silly.
I will delete any addresses or phone numbers on this blog because there's no place for them on these sites. It would be like callign the radio and giving out one's phone number over the air.
Lies designed to get someone in trouble? You're confusing me.
Lies designed to get someone in trouble? You're confusing me.
Dishonest Dave Diano saying that I threatened Obama when he well knows this to be untrue. While he in fact has threatened President Bush's life on a couple of occasions.
Post a Comment